Old Ellen and the May Hill Sensation

Old Ellen and the May Hill Sensation#

As the old tales tell it, one of the giveaway signs of a witch is their animal familiar: a black cat, for example, or a dog, or maybe even a hare. But a connection might also exist between an animal that had been bewitched, and the person responsible for the bewitchment. Or so belief appeared to go in a certain part of the Forest of Dean in the 1830s.

The previous story, from the Monmouth Merlin, was syndicated widely, even as far as the London papers, with the opening “In a town near the Forest of Dean lately occurred, …” (for example, The Examiner - Sunday 16 February 1834, Globe - Thursday 13 February 1834).

A little over fifty years later, in the 1880s, a flourishing time for the new field of folklore (the FolkLore society was founded in 1878, for example) the original story seems to have been rediscovered:

But even as the nineteenth century came to a close, and the new century dawned, a new age of enlightenment with a scientific world view, a new age of reason, where civilised society could study the behaviour of savages with a critical eye, it seems that some of the folk who in lived in the Forest of Dean still believed they had a local witch.

Robbery at May Hill#

Our story begins with an otherwise innocuous report of a local robbery, from a home in May Hill, neat Mitcheldean, in the Forest of Dean.

So far, so Agatha Christie. A mystery, perhaps, in how the robber had managed to enter the property, found the valuable prize hidden away in a drawer, and then made good their escape without any sign of how they had entered, or exited, the premises.

A local suspect was identified, and their house searched, but to no effect.

At which point, Mr Markey seems to have gone to the local Miss Marple — the local witch — to solicit an alternative form of help. At which point, a rather disturbing twist was added to the story, as Mr Markey’s daughter and grand-daughter were afflicted with some mental torment, and his wife disappeared.

A search for Mrs. Markey was organised, but without success.

Despite hearing the searchers, Mrs. Markey had not reveled herself. But a day later, she returned home of her own volition, albeit with magical protection.

Despite the return of Mrs. Markey, things continued to get worse for the family, as Markey’s second son also became afflicted by the madness that had overtaken his daughter, grand-daughter and wife.

The Ross Gazette reiterated the whole of the story to date:

The condition of Markey’s second son, however, has deteriorated to such an extent that he essentially seems to have been “sectioned”.

The story now starts pay attention to the sense in which “witchcraft” might have a role to play in the proceedings.

The still intrigued London press provided a recap of the story so far in the weekend papers, albeit with slightly garbled facts in the case of the Daily Mirror:

Other London papers reported how Markey’s house had started to become something of a tourist attraction.

In certain quarters, it appears that doubts were being raised as to whether there had been any robbery at all…

Elsewhere, it seems as if one correspondent had tracked down the “witch” consulted by Markey, and had an interview with her:

Reporters for the Daily Mirror also appeared to have been on the case, securing not just a comment from the old woman, but also a photograph of her, along with her dog, as well as photographs of Mr. Markey:

A photograph of Old Ellen, May 1905

Fig. 1 A woman of seventy, known as Old Ellen, who lives in the Forest of Dean, is alleged to have bewitched the family of Farmer Markey, of May Hill, near Cinderford. Owing to her wiles, it is said, Markey has become bedridden, and his son, daughter, and granddaughter have been rendered insane. No. 1 is a portrait of Old Ellen, the reputed witch; No. 2 shows Farmer Markey at work in his garden; and No. 3 is a photograph of his son and niece.#

The weekly Ross Gazette reviewed the events over the previous week for the readers in nearby Ross-on-Wye:

Perhaps as a result of coverage of the story by the London papers, Irish Parliamentary Party MP for South Down, Jeremiah McVeagh, raised a question on the matter in the House of Commons.

McVeagh’s concerns appear to be whether safeguards should be put in place against the practice of witchcraft, also this may have been in part to reassure the populace in order to prevent them taking their own vigilante action against Old Ellen. (Only ten years before, in 1895, in Clonmel, Tipperary, a young woman, Bridget Cleary, had been burned, and killed, as “a witch” —or more accurately, as a changeling— by her husband.)

A recap in the Gloucester Journal - Saturday 03 June 1905 reprinted Old Ellen’s interview and the House of Commons report as they appeared in the Gloucester Citizen.

A summary of the story, and a brief comment upon it, also made it across the border and into the Welsh newspapers:

In Ross-on-Wye, the Ross Gazette was still reporting matters a week or so after everyone else!

A statement by Ellen Hayward herself was then published in the Gloucester Citizen of Friday, 9th June, 1905, and again, with the same headline, in the Ross Gazette a week later, on Thursday 15 June 1905.

What looks rather like a specifically placed advertorial immediately preceded the article in the Ross Gazette.

Another denial from the pen of Old Ellen herself appeared the Chepstow Weekly Advertiser:

And with that, the story fell out of the papers.

For now, at least.

To Bewitch the Witch#

Following the May Hill affair, Old Ellen appears to have continued in her role as a local “fixer”. As a result of the news coverage, people from ever further away appear to have sought out her services. And in one case at least, one customer appears to have been disappointed with the service provided, as the following, very widely circulated news item, demonstrates.

That story was perhaps picked up from a rather more complete court report that had been published in the Gloucester papers a week before.

Other, quite comprehensive, summaries of the original report also appeared made it into some of the regional rural press.

Several years later, an echo of the story appeared once again in the Gloucester press.

And then the tale disappears from the news record, and is perhaps now remembered only in locally told stories, and small print run collections of local tales and legends.