Life Continues

Contents

Life Continues#

So did Carus Wilson’s tracts, and the opening of the new Church, lead to an improved change in the morals of Newport?

The following tale amusingly tells of how one visitor to the Tontine Tap had his lunch stolen.

Did Sarah Duffy also have a sister, perhaps, Emma Duffey, who had also appeared before the Court for disorderly conduct near the Barrack gate in June 1856?

Elsewhere in the environs of Newport, the Revd. W. Carus Wilson was still using sermons in support of fundraising efforts, this time for the Carisbrooke infant school.

The memorial printed following his death described his preaching style.

Three weeks or so later, Revd. W. Carus Wilson’s son, the Revd. W. W. Carus Wilson, could also be seen preaching on the Island, with his father giving a lecture the following week.

Meanwhile, many of the Court reports suggest a picture of what the comings and goings of life in the streets of Newport must have been like.

In the following case, it is perhaps interesting to wonder what the accused was doing between twenty to, and twenty past, eleven at night, in between randomly assaulting people?!

At the Borough Licensing day in 1858, some old familiar pub names appear on the “could do better” list.

One of the licensees, James Tribbick of the White Hart, seemed to have only recently take over that establishment.

The following account of a disorderly house also paints its own picture of what the scene must have been like!

A brief report in the Hampshire Telegraph in February 1860 identifies three separate charges of disorderly behaviour along similar lines, although with very different outcomes.

See also

Various of the court appearances of Caroline Pierce are collated elsewhere.

A more complete report in the Hampshire Independent perhaps gives an indication of the differing characters of the variously accused.

Another of the names that makes several appearances in the Court reports, albeit for a variety of reasons, is Mary Ann Cooper.

Another of the situations that doesn’t seem to change is the way in which stolen goods make their way into the houses of the unfortunate(s).

In other situations, were items that shouldn’t be there an indicator of something — or someone — else that was missing?!

Presumably some relation to the James Tribbick who had taken on the White Hart in Pyle-street, in April 1858, and reprimanded for keeping a disorderly house at the annual licensing day later that year, Mary Ann Tribbick was to appear before the court ten years later charged with running a disorderly house of her own.

Mary Ann Tribbick is back in court again, although this time as a victim of a theft, in September 1869.

At the Borough Licensing Day of September 1869, it seems that town’s citizenry had been writing memorials again, although this time is seems to be targeted against the abuse of licensing hours as much as anything. Notably, South-street and the Tontine Tap get a mention, and not necessarily for positive reasons.

Another tale from the King’s Arms, which seems to have been a go to place for finding absconded soldiers from the Barracks.

Miss Emily Kent#

One name that keeps recurring in the court reports throughout the 1860s is a certain Miss Emily Kent, resident of the House of Industry, whose repeated bad behaviour kept landing her stints of hard labour in Winchester gaol. Despite recognising that the sentences were not having effect on changing her behaviour, the court kept sending her back for more. We can easily imagine “thank you, gentlemen,” as her stock reply.