Plans to Refloat the Eurydice#

The inclement weather of the week following the downing of the Eurydice hampered efforts to explore the wreck and proceed with operations that might lead to her recovery.

Some of the smaller boats on the Eurydice were recovered and a start was made bringing up the sails and removing the masts, a necessary step to take before attempts could be made to raise the wreck.

The action of the sea had also rolled the Eurydice from her side into an upright position, sitting on her keel.

Plans for raising the wreck were already being advanced: the proposed approach was to lash two other ships, the Pearl and the Rinaldo, to the sides of Eurydice at low tide, then raise her with the rising tide and move her closer to shore. Using such “lifts” to bring her closer to the shore, she could then be pumped out and floated herself on a rising tide.

Elsewhere, various events were already being organised locally to support a fundraising effort intended to generate alms for the widows, orphans and relatives of the deceased sailors; a national call for support had also been made through the pages of the Times . Reports had also started coming in from other ships in the vicinty of the Wight on the previous Sunday, including the captain of the Romulus.

There was also a mystery: a sailor’s straw hat bearing the Eurydice’s name on the ribbon, had been revovered with the name “G. Field” marked inside it. But no similar name appeared to have been published in the crew list. And an query: why were there no stimulants available on board the Emma, the unstated implication being that perhaps Tabor and Ferrier’s lives might have been saved had they been available.

_images/ILN_1878_loss_of_euridyce_apr_04_009.jpg

Fig. 20 Illustrated London News — Divers at Work on H.M.S. Eurydice, April 4, 1878#

On Sunday, 31st March, a week on from the disaster, collections were made and sermons preached on behalf of the lost souls. Accounts of the severity of the storm that had downed the Eurydice but had been experienced elsewhere in the UK were also being reported in the Island news. A court martial to be held involving the two survivors was also announced.

Noting the classical tragedy of Orpheus and Eurydice, it was also observed that Eurydice’s “consort ship”, H.M.S. Orpheus had also been downed in not dissimilar circumstances 15 years previously, albeit on the other side of the world, on April 7th, 1863.

In an attempt to encourage islanders, particularly fishermen, to help retrieve bodies of the deceased sailors, a two pounds reward was offered for anyone retrieving and landing a body.

Amongst the other observations in the following report is a note that the membership of one the Naval Lodges of the Good Templars, a fraternal organisation, accepting both men and women, that promoted temperance (which is to say, total abstinence of alcohol) was lost with the ship. It was also observed that the Emma was a “temperance craft”, where not even the medicine chest contained brandy or any other spirit. Such an omission was seen as a matter of concern in medical emergencies such as exposure.

A description of a similar tragedy, the loss of the schooner Pincher, along with 35 souls, on Sunday, March 4, 1838, along with the loss of the Mary Rose on July, 18th, 1545, were also provided.

At Devonport, similar scenes to those at Portsmouth dockyard were evident. Several tragic stories regarding relatives of several of the sailors are described.

A fortnight on, and mutterings were afoot on the Island, and elsewhere, about whether the accident had been preventable.

An intriguing question was also raised as to whether there might have been a bet in play about how quickly the Eurydice could make it back home to Portsmouth from Bermuda.

Adverts announcing the two pound reward for recovered bodies were also still running.

Via the Admiralty, a statement regarding the weather around the time of the accident provided by the steamship Badger, which had passed the Eurydice (presumably) on the port side, near St. Catherine’s Point, at about 3.30pm, half an hour before the squall hit, was released suggesting that the it could well have hit the Eurydice by surprise.

Various bits of wreckage were also found floating in the sea, or starting to come ashore, including a ship chest and several articles of clothing bearing the names of W. French, J. Kelly, and H. Scull.

Amongst the hearsay being reported was the likely erroneous claim that “no more than 15 per cent. of our sailors can swim”. Further biographical details regarding the crew were also emerging, such as that of Daniel Harley who had been a member of the Arctic Expedition that had reached “the highest Northern latitude ever reached by man, on the memorable 12th of May, 1876”.

More details regarding last dying moments of one of the officers rescued by the Emma were also revealed.

It seems there might be some more sketches out there that I haven’t tracked down yet!

Meanwhile, more information was coming in as to who might have been on the ship, and who might have not.

As time went on, more details arrived regarding additional men who had been discharged onto the Eurydice in the West Indies.

Another of the smaller boats from the Eurydice also appeared to have been recovered.

And the salvage attempt was not going well - had somebody blundered in the planning?

From the Island, the salvage boats could be seen out in the bay, whilst dissatisfaction with the attempts being made continued to grow.

A month on, and still no success in raising the Eurydice, a change of plan was called for, and support from additional, private divers was bought in.

_images/ILN_1878_loss_of_euridyce_apr_27_007.jpg

Fig. 21 Illustrated London News — The wreck of the Eurydice: Divers examining a wreck by the submarine light, April 27, 1878#

The company divers brought with them improved support for illuminating the wreck.

With Pearl acting as a lightship, the Rinaldo returned to harbour to receive more ballast, and the lighters were returned to port in the face of inclement weather. Meanwhile, one of the divers was prevented from working following a back injury.

Elsewhere, comments were being made around the ability of navy men to swim, and whether such a skill would have been a life saving one anyway following the sinking of the Eurydice.

Over a month on from the downing of the Eurydice, and by now the sunken wreck had started to sink into the sand. An attempt by the Malta to try to pull her free was unsuccessful, and an attempt at lifting the Eurydice was aborted when the steel hawsers snapped. Apparently, the ship was heavier than was supposed by virtue of the amount of sand she was now also carrying.

At this point, it seems the editor couldn’t help but remark: _”Naval men have had more experience in sinking ships than raising them. A private firm probably knows much more about the latter.’_Elsewhere, the Eurydice herself was described as “the dilettante production of a gallant admiral”.

A new plan was proposed involving a Popoff airbag that could be inserted into the wreck and inflated and wooden “toggles” (stout cylindrical pieces of oak timber, a foot in diameter and 8ft. long, with a shackle in the centre to which a hawser is attached) that would be placed across the inside of the ports and then take the strain of attached hawsers.

In readiness to clear the bodies from the ship once she could be raised, a hundred coffins were on standby. How many were on board, none could say, though it was notable that bodies had not, as yet, been recovered from the sea.

In formulating the new plan, it seems that a more considered estimate of the potential dead weight of the vessel would be required than had perhaps previously been assumed.