The Case of Henry Wheeler

Forgeries to a very considerable extent, December, 1835

https://www.britishnewspaperarchive.co.uk/viewer/bl/0000183/18351218/027/0004 London Evening Standard - Friday 18 December 1835

POLICE Bow-street — Stamp Forgeries — Information has recently been obtained by the authorities at the Stamp Office, at Somerset-house, that forgeries of stamps have been for some time past carried on to a very considerable extent, especially in the article of playing cards. In consequence of this information Ellis, Ballard, and Keys, officers of this establishment, were ordered by Sir F. Roe to make inquiries, the result of which was, that warrants were issued against several suspected persons. Ellis went with a search warrant to No. 122, John-street, Smithfield, where he took into custody a card-maker, named Henry Wheeler, who occupied the attic floor, and found upon his person thirty-eight pieces of very thin paper, each containing an impression (forged) of the stamp upon the Ace of Spades, forming one of a pack of playing cards. On searching aloft over the attic he found a plate from which there could be no doubt the forgeries he found upon the prisoner’s person had been struck.

The officer brought the prisoner before Sir F. Roe at the evening sitting, and the above circumstances having been briefly stated, the prisoner, who declined saying anything, was remanded, to give time to produce the neceissary formal evidence.

Mr. Sircum, and two other gentlemen, attended from the Stamp Office, for the prosecution. The prisoner was once a licensed manufacturer of cards, but in consequence of some faux pas (it is said) the license was withdrawn, and he has since been extensively engaged in manufacturing cards with forged stamps.

A respectably dressed man, about the middle age, named John Liomas, was next put to the bar by Ballard under the following circumstances :—

Ballard, it appeared, had a search warrant against the prisoner on suspicion of being concerned in the transactions with which Wheeler, the former prisoner, stands accused, and in consequence of information which he obtained he went to a house in Grove-street, Hollowa y-road, where he discovered that the prisoner carried on an illicit still.

The prisoner did not deny the charge, but said he had two aged parents to support, besides a large family, and begged Sir F. Roe to be lenient with him.

Sir Frederick said the act of parliament was imperative, and he had no discretionary power. He must, therefore, convict him in the penalty of 30l. and in default of payment he must stand committed to the House of Correction for three months, there to be kept to hard labour. The prisoner was taken away in custody.

Respectably dressed, about middle age, December, 1835

https://www.britishnewspaperarchive.co.uk/viewer/bl/0001427/18351218/053/0003

Morning Advertiser - Friday 18 December 1835

POLICE. BOW-STREET.— Stamp Forgeries.— Information has recently been obtained by the authorities at the Stamp-office, at Somerset-house, that forgeries of stamps had been for some time past carried on to a very considerable extent, especially in the article of playing cards. In consequence of this information Ellis, Ballard, and Keys, officers of this establishment, were ordered by Sir F. Roe to make inquiries. The result of which was that warrants were issued against several suspected persons. Ellis went with search warrant to No. 122, St. John-street, Smithfield, where be took into custody a cardmaker, named Henry Wheeler, who occupied the attic floor, and found upon his person 38 pieces of very thin paper, each containing an impression (forged) of the stamp upon the “ace of spades,” forming one of a pack of playing cards. On searching a loft over the attic he found a plate, from which there could be no doubt the forgeries he found upon the prisoner’s person bad been struck.

The officer brought the prisoner before Sir F. Roe, at the evening sitting, and the above circumstances having been briefly stated, the prisoner, who declined saying anything, was remanded to give time to produce the necessary formal evidence.

Mr. Sircum, and two other gentlemen, attended from the Stamp-office for the prosecution.

The prisoner was once a licensed manufacturer of cards, but in consequence of some faux pas, it is said, the licence was withdrawn, and be has since been extensively engaged in nufacturing cards with forged stamps.

A respectably-dressed man, about the middle age, named John Lomas, was next put to the bar by Ballard, under the following curious circumstances :—

Ballard, it appeared, had a search-warrant against the prisoner, on suspicion of being coacerned in the transactions with which Wheeler (the former prisoner) stands accused, and in consequence of information which he obtained he went close to a house in Grove-street, Holloway-road, but wishing to watch to see the prisoner before he proceeded to search, he waited some time, and saw the prisoner come out. He followed him some distance, and observed that he had something of flat square shape in a bag under his arm. He at length stopped him, and took him into a public-house, and asked him his name, which he said was John Chapman. Ballard asked him where he lived, and he said, “Before 1 answer that question want to know who and what you are.” Ballard said he would satisfy him upon that subject, but he must first have his address. The prisoner then wrote upon a piece of paper “John Chapman, No. 20, High-street, Highgate.” Ballard asked him if he came direct from that place, and he said he had. He then told him it was not so, and he must take him back to the place he had come from. He refused to go, but the officer told him he must, upon which he said, “if you are determined to take me back to the house I am a ruined man,” adding, that what the officer was in search of was in the back kitchen, and he would shew it to him himself, but he begged he would not frighten his wife, for she was not well, and would be greatly alarmed. He stated also, that he was “driven to it by distress.” The officer all this time, no doubt, was quite satisfied that he had hit the mark, and that the matter referred to by the prisoner, was that which was mentioned in his warrant. When, however, he was conducted to the back kitchen of No. 2, Grove-street, he found two tubs containing twelve gallons of wash, apparently ready for use, two casks of spirits, and three or four bottles of spirits; altogether about twelve gallons, together with a worm, and all the usual apparatus of an illicit still. Ballard searched the house by virtue of his warrant, for other things, but found nothing to implicate the prisoner in the stamp forgeries. He, however, brought him away upon the new and unexpected charge of keeping an illicit still.

The prisoner did not deny the charge, but said he had two aged parents to support, besides a large family, and begged Sir F. Roe to be lenient to him.

Sir Frederick said the Act of Parliament was imperative, and he had no discretionary power. He must therefore convict him in the penalty of 30l., and in default of payment, he must stand committed to the House of Correction for three months, there to be kept to hard labour. The prisoner was taken away in custody.

In consequence of numerous frauds, December, 1835

https://www.britishnewspaperarchive.co.uk/viewer/bl/0002408/18351218/034/0004 Morning Herald (London) - Friday 18 December 1835

POLICE. BOW-STREET. CHARGE OF FORGING STAMPS ON PLAYING CARDS.

In Consequence of numerous frauds committed on the revenue by means of forging the stamp on playing cards, the Commissioners of Stamps applied at this office, yesterday, for the assistance of some experienced officers; and Ellis, Ballard, and Keys received instructions to endeavour, if possible, to detect the offenders. In pursuance of these directions, Ellis brought before the Magistrates an elderly man, named Henry Wheeler, whom he charged with having in his possession an engraved plate to imitate the Government stamp affixed to playing cards to denote that the King’s duty had been paid; and the prisoner was further charged with forging that stamp on 38 separate pieces of paper.

From the statement of Ellis, it appeared that in consequence of information he received, he went to the house No. 122, St. John-street, Smithfield, and found the prisoner in the occupation of the attics. He immediately commenced a search, and in a loft above the attics he found the stamp produced, together with the pieces of paper, on each of which was impressed a similar stamp to that which is affixed to the ace of spades. He then took the prisoner into custody and conveyed him to this office.

The prisoner declined to say any thing in answer to the charge; and, at the request of Mr. Surcomb and other gentlemen who attended from the Stamp. office, he was remanded for a week. It appeared that the prisoner was formerly known to carry on the business of a licensed card-maker, but had been deprived of his license.

A respectable-looking man, named John Lomas, was then placed at the bar, charged by Ballard, the officer, with working a private still.

Ballard, it appeared, had alao been engaged in endeavouring to discover the parties who were guilty of forging the stamp on cards, and having received information that the prisoner Lomas was one of the suspected persons, he obtained a search-warrant to examine his lodgings, when, singularly enough, although he failed in connecting the prisoner with the Stamp office forgeries, he detected him in carrying on a no less profitable fraud on the revenue by means of a private still.

It appeared from his statement to the Magistrate that he went with a search-warrant to the residence at No. 2, Grove-street, Holloway. road. He watched the house until he saw the prisoner leave it, and having followed him some distance, he took him to a public house and demanded his name. The prisoner said his name was John Chapman, and that he lived at No. 20, High-street, Highgate, Ballard then asked him if he had come direct from Highgate. The prisoner answered ” Yes.” Ballard then told him that he knew to the contrary, and said “You must go with me to the house you have come from, adding that he was an officer from Bow-street. The prisoner then said, ” If you are determined to take me I am a ruined man; I know what you have come about; I will show you the house, and you will find what you want in the back kitchen.” The officer supposing that the confession of the prisoner related to the Stamp-office forgeries, accompanied the prisoner back to the house from which he had traced him, in the back kitchen of which the prisoner pointed to the private still, ” There it is, but for GOD’S sake don’t alarm my wife and children.” The officer was, of course, somewhat surprised at this discovery, and sent for an Excise officer, who took charge of the still and about 10 gallons of spirits ready for use, together with a quantity of wash, molasses, &c. Ballard then searched the house, but found nothing to connect the prisoner with the other charge, and he conveyed him to this office on the charge of working the still.

The prisoner implored the Magistrate to mitigate the penalty which he was aware was attached to the offence he had committed.

Sir F. ROE said that the Act of Parliament gave him no power to reduce the fine, which was fixed at 3l., and the prisoner being unable to pay that sum, was committed to hard labour for three months in the House of Correction.

Feloniously, and knowlingly, and without lawful excuse, January, 1836

https://www.britishnewspaperarchive.co.uk/viewer/bl/0000174/18360107/035/0004 Morning Post - Thursday 07 January 1836

CENTRAL CRIMINAL COURT.— Jan. 6. OLD COURT.

Henry Wheeler, aged 37, was indicted for feloniously and knowingly, and without lawful excuse, having in his possession 500 impressions of a forged die, intended to resemble the die of the ace of spades, used by the Commissioners of tbe Stamps and Taxes.

The Attorney-General and Mr. Phillips appeared for the prosecution.

Mr. Clarkson was Counsel for the prisoner.

James Ellis, an officer on the Bow-street establishment, stated that on the 15th December he went with a search-warrant, accompanied by an officer of the Stamp Office, to 122, St. John-street. On the door was an engraved plate, bearing the words, ” Henry Wheeler, card-manufacturer.” He went down to a lower kitchen, where he found the prisoner, who acknowledged himself to be the master of the house. He asked witness to read his warrant, which was done ; when he said some one must have given the information out of spite. Witness and Stowell, accompanied by the prisoner, went to the attic, and there found a large quantity of impressions of playing-cards. He then went to the front of the attic, and there found, in an aperture in the ceiling, one dozen packs of cards, and a bag containing thirty-four sheets of the impressions of the ace of spades, each sheet containing ten impressions. He had also discovered materials for making the cards, and a great quantity of cards in the process of manufacture. In all he found 180 packs of cards, wanting only the ace of spades. He seized all these things, and took the prisoner into custody.

This was the case for the prosecution.

The prisoner made no defence.

Charles Brine, of 28, Old ‘Change, deposed that he had purchased a quantity of waste paper from the Stamp Office, one ream of which bore the impression of the ace of spades as it was before the alteration in 1828. Several witnesses gave the prisoner a good character. The Learned Judge summed up, and the Jury returned a verdict of Guilty.

The impressions were very badly done, January, 1836

https://www.britishnewspaperarchive.co.uk/viewer/bl/0001427/18360107/020/0003

Morning Advertiser - Thursday 07 January 1836

Henry Wheeler, aged 37, was indicted for feloniously and knowingly, and without lawful excuse, having in his possession 500 impressions of a forged die, intended to resemble the die of the ace of spades, used by the Commissioners of the Stamps and Taxes.

THe Attorney-General and Mr. Phillips appeared for the prosecution.

Mr. Clarkson was Counsel for the prisoner.

James Ellis, officer on the Bow-street establishment, stated that on the 15th of December he went with a search-warrant, accompanied by an officer of the Stamp-office, to No. 122, St. John-street. On the door was an engraved plate bearing the words “Henry Wheeler, card-manufacturer”. He went down to a lower kitchen, where he found the prisoner, who acknowledged himself to be master of the house. Ha asked witness to read his warrant, which was done ; when he said some one must have given the information out of spite. Witness and Stowell, accompanied by the prisoner, went to the attic, and there found large quantity of impressions of playing-cards. He then went to the front of the attic, and there found, in an aperture in the ceiling, one dozen packs of cards, and bag containing 34 sheets of the impressions of the ace of spades, each sheet containing ten impressions. He had also discovered materials for making the cards, and great quantity of cards in the process of manufacture. In all he found 180 packs of cards, wautiog only the ace of spades. He seized all these things, and took the prisoner into custody.

John Stowell, an officer employed by the Stamp-office, corroborated the last witness, whom he accompanied in the search.

Richard Godson Mace, officer of the Marlborough-street Office, also gave similar testimony.

Joseph Harris, the Deputy Supervisor of Stamps in Somerset House, deposed that the impressions of the ace of spades produced Ellis were forgeries. It was the custom of the card-makers to send paper to the Stamp-office order to have the impression put on by the dies provided for that purpose by the Commissioners of Stamps. The stamps are usually impressed with the name of the card-maker. Mr. Thomas Creswick has a plate of the description pointed out. Mr. Creswick’s name appeared on all the forged impressions found in the prisoner’s possession.

In his cross-examination by Mr. Clarkson, he said the impressions were very badly done, and were not at all likely to deceive any one acquainted with cards. He did not know whether Thomas Wheeler was a licensed card-maker after the year 1828, in which year the new die came out.

Charles Preston, Secretary to the Board of Stamps, deposed that the impressions produced were not taken from Mr. Creswick’s plate, which was kept at tte Stamp-office– they therefore must be forgeries.

Edward Gregory proved that the prisoner had occupied the house in question for two and half years. It was neither in the City of London, Westminster, or the Borough of Southwark, to which places only licences can be given, according to 9th Geo. IV., sec. 7.

This was the case for the prosecution.

The prisoner made no defence.

Charles Brine, of No. 28, Old-change, deposed that he had purchased a quantity of waste paper from th# Stamp-office, one ream of which bore the impression of the ace-of-spades as it was before the alteration in 1828.

Several witnesses gave the prisoner good character.

The Learned Judge summed up, and the Jury returned a verdict of Guilty.

Despite no longer being a capital offence, the penalty for forging the Ace of Spades was still severe however, as Henry Wheller found to his cost in 1836, when he was transported for life for committing such an offence.

Transported for life, January, 1836

https://britishnewspaperarchive.co.uk/viewer/bl/0001427/18360108/025/0004 Morning Advertiser - Friday 08 January 1836

Sentences Upon the Prisoners

Transported for Life.— …, Henry Wheeler, …

The Trial of Henry Wheeler, 4 January 1836

https://www.oldbaileyonline.org/record/t18360104-340 HENRY WHEELER. Deception; forgery. 4th January 1836.

340. HENRY WHEELER was indicted for feloniously, knowingly, and without lawful excuse, having in his possession. 38 pieces of paper, each having thereon, the impression of a false, forged, and counterfeit die, resembling a die which had been used by, and under the direction of the Commissioners of Stamps and Taxes, denoting a certain stamp-duty charged and imposed by 9 Geo. IV.—19 other COUNTS, varying the manner of laying the charge.

MR. ATTORNEY GENERAL with MR. PHILLIPS conducted the Prosecution.

JAMES ELLIS . I am an officer of the police. On Tuesday, the 15th of December, I went to No. 122, St. John-street, with a warrant—Stowell accompanied me, (he belongs to the Stamp Office,) and Mace, a police-officer—there is a private door to the house, with a brass-plate on the door, on which was engraved, “H. Wheeler, Card-manufacturer”—there is a shop door, with “H. Wheeler, Card-manufacturer and Printer” on each side—I went in with my companions, at the shop door—I asked for Mr. Wheeler—I went down stairs into a cellar-kitchen, and there saw the prisoner—I asked him who he was—he said his name was Wheeler—I asked if he was master of the house—he said, “Yes”—I told him I had got a warrant to search his house for a forged ace of spades—I do not exactly recollect what he said, but he requested I would let him look at the warrant—I read it over to him, with the exception of the name of the informat—he made no particular observation at that time, and I went up stairs—he afterwards said some person had done it (laid the information) out of spite, or something to that effect—I left him and his wife, two sons and daughter, in charge of Mace, and went up stairs with Stowell—we just took a cursory view of the different rooms, and I returned back and found the prisoner in the cellar—I had left him in the kitchen—I told him I must go and search the house, having searched the shop in his presence—I told him I would go up to the top of the house to begin—he said, “You had better begin at the bottom,” or something to that effect; but we went to the top—I went first into the attic, which was partly divided into two, but part of the partition was down—in the back part of the attic, I went through a trap-door into the roof part, and there found a quantity of playing-cards, some loose, and some in packages—unfortunately, after taking the prisoner away, all the cards I found got mixed—I handed the cards I found there down to Stowell—the prisoner was present—I then went into the front part of the attic, and found a hole in the ceiling, through which I got into the roof of that part, there being no other way to do so—I there found a quantity of cards—there might be ten or twelve packs—I also found this bag—it is in the same state as I found it—I gave the second parcel of cards to Stowell, and dropped the bag down to him also—I examined it (opens it)—I found in it these papers—I believe they are all the same—there are thirty-four sheets with ten impressions of the ace of spades on each sheet—being three hundred and forty impressions—I also found in the bag thirty-eight impressions loose—I tied them up together, and am sure these are the same—they are in a state to put on cards—some of them are pasted on cards—I then sent for a coach, and took the prisoner into custody—I searched the house afterwards, and found a great quantity of cards, and materials for making cards—there were a great many more packs of cards in the bag, consisting of fifty-one cards each—those wanted the ace of spades—they were loose in the bag—I also found this parcel, which contains ninety-nine aces of spades, some on cards, and some on papers—here are thirty-seven aces of spades without the stamp—they were in the bag—I also found some blank cards, some old spade aces, some stamped, and some not—these were in the bag—I found a great quantity of papers and cards in various parts of the house—in nearly every room—here are the materials for making them, which I found—here is a block for printing, with the knaves and kings and queens, and other materials for card printing—here are some cards in the process of manufacturer, not finished—altogether there are one hundred and eighty packs wanting the ace of spades.

JOHN STOWELL . I am an officer of the Stamp Duties. I accompanied Ellis to search the prisoner’s house on Tuesday, the 15th of December—I went up stairs with him and Ellis—I heard Ellis read the warrant to him before we went up stairs—Ellis searched the loft, and handed down ten or twelve packs of cards to me, some in papers, and some loose—he then went to the front part of the attic, got up a broken place between the plaster, and handed me down more cards, and a bag—I opened it, and found some cards, which I have marked—the bag contained the things now produced—the other cards, which Ellis has produced, were found in the house.

RICHARD GODWIN MACE . I have heard the two witnesses evidence—they have stated correctly what took place in my presence—I found a plate.

JOHN ELLIS re-examined. I marked the date on which I went on the back of this card—it was on the 15th—Mr. Harris has seen the aces of spades found in the bag.

JOSEPH HARRIS . I am deputy-supervisor of stamps in the stamp department at Somerset House. (Looking at the thirty-eight impressions of the ace of spades) these are forged—the circle round the garter is very different; the genuine one being engine-turned—it is the custom of card manufacturers to send paper to the Stamp Officer for the ace of spades to be stamped—the Commissioners provide a stamp for that purpose—they send plain paper to us in reams—the Commissioners sometimes provide a stamp with the manufacturer’s name on it, at his request—there was such a plate provided for a manufacturer named Thomas Creswick—there is a book kept at the Stamp Office with impressions of the plates which are prepared—I have it here—it has impressions of the plates prepared for Creswick—the date is on the impression; “14th of June, 1828”—these aces of spades appear to be a forgery of that plate—the other aces found in the bag are all forgeries of other plates, of other manufacturers.

Cross-examined by MR. CLARKSON. Q. In 1828, what was the duty payable on playing-cards? A. Up to 1828, it was 1s. 6d. on the ace of spades, 6d. on the wrapper, and 6d. on the label.

Q. The card you call a forgery, appears in no respect a resemblance of Creswick’s plate? A. It is very bad—it would certainly not deceive any body in the Stamp Office, nor any body else who examined it, I should think—there is a great variation between the lion and unicorn, and the crown; and in the ring encircling the motto—I have reason to believe all the cards produced are forgeries—Creswick is still a card-manufacturer—this old ace of spades is a genuine one—some of these old ones I have not seen before—I am not able to judge whether these are genuine or not, not having seen them before—I believe them to be forged, but I am not positive—this one I am sure is a genuine one—it is a very old ace, which was used previous to my coming into the Office—here is one genuine, and one which I have no knowledge of—the rest are blanks—the one with Creswick on it is genuine—this other pack is also a stamp used before I came into the office, and I cannot speak positively about them—I never saw Thomas Wheeler—there was a person of that name, a licensed card-manufacturer—that was not the prisoner—I do not know whether he is alive or dead—in 1828, when the stamp-duty was altered, the impression of the aces of spades was also altered—I was in the Stamp Office at that time.

Q. At that time, do you know that the Stamp Office had a great deal of card-paper, with the duties on it, of the time before the alteration took place? A. No: I do not know that; nor that they sold it as wastepaper—the genuine paper would be in the custody of the warehousekeeper of cards and dies—he has no perquisites, that I am aware of, respecting cards and paper—I have no access to the warehouse, and I do not know whether things are sold or not—there is only one warehouse—Lewis

Legue is the keeper—I am not quite certain whether he was so before 1828—I do not think that Thomas Wheeler was a licensed manufacturer of cards after 1828, no plate being provided for him, but I cannot be positive.

MR. ATTORNEY-GENERAL. Q. Was a new die for the aces provided in 1828, after the passing of the Act of Parliment? A. there was—if varied considerably from the old die—this plate for Creswick was according to the new die—those bearing the name of T. Wheeler I have compared with the specimen-book—I did not compare those two which the prisoner; counsel showed me.

CHARLES PRESSWICK . I am secretary to the Board of Stamps at Somerset House. On the delivery of the new plate of the ace of spades, engraved for the Board, I take it to the stamping room, and take an impression of it in a book for that purpose—here is the book—in June, 1828, the ace of spades impression was changed—I saw the new impression made in the book, and this is the impression taken at the time—this is an impression from the genuine plate—I apprehend this plate has been used for Creswick since 1828—these thirty-eight impressions are forged.

Cross-examined. Q. What sort of forgeries should you call them? A. They are imitation of the plate, no doubt—they resemble it in some measure—they vary considerably on being compared—any card-maker would perceive the variation.

COURT. Q. Not every card-player? A. I should apprehend not

MR. CLARKSON. Q. Can you undertake to say whether these cards have ever been played with? A. Some of them certainly not, for they are not pasted, but on paper only—there was a wheeler a licensed card-manufacturer, and I think his initial was T., but I cannot say whether it was Thomas—I do not know whether the prisoner is a licensed card-maker—I do not think there is now any registered card-maker named Wheeler.

Q. There was an alteration in the duty in 1828; can you tell whether, at that time, there remained a stock in hand of card-paper of the duties then payable?. A. Not of the ace of spades, certainly—if any was unconsumed it would be cancelled—they have not been sold for waste-paper.

MR. PHILLIPS. Q. Is it the custom, in making cards, to paste this paper over the thick card, to finish it? A. Certainly.

MR. CLARKSON. Q. Can you recollect whether a person named Russell did not buy some thousands of old aces of spades? A. I have no knowledge of that—I cannot imagine how such a thing could have occured—I have no knowledge or belief such a thing could be done—the stamps for the ace of spades only vary reference to the name of the card-maker.

COURT. Q. You have a stamp denoting the duty, and if a manufacturer takes a certain quantity of stamps, and wishes his name impressed on them, in addition to the ordinary stamp, you impress his name?. A. Plates are provided for every card-maker, with the name—it is the same impression, except the name.

EDMUND GREGORY . I am landlord of the house, No. 122, St. John-street, Smithfield—it is in the country of Middlesex—it is not in London, middle of the year 1833—he has occupied it as my tenant ever since—I do not know who was in possession of it before, as it was empty at the time I came into possession of it—the lease was surrendered to me.

Cross-examined. Q. Did you ever see Martin Morillia there? A. I

never heard the name—I do not know Thomas Wheeler—I have only seen the prisoner when I called there for rent.

Prisoner’s Defence. I am not guilty.

CHARLES BOURNE BRIND . I am a grocer and oilman, and live at No. 28, Old change. I have lately dealt considerably in waste-paper—I had a quantity from Somerset House last July and August, and among it was a ream of foolscap paper, with the stamp of the ace of spades on it—I have not got any of it with me—I believe it was sold with other paper.

COURT. Q. Do you recollect what duty was marked on them? A. No: I did not take notice.

MR. CLARKSON. Q. Were they such as these (Part of the 38?) A. Yes.

COURT. Q. You cannot tell what was the duty—what do you mean by their being such as those? A. It was the ace of spades.

MR. ATTORNEY-GENERAL. Q. Look at this, should you take that for a stamp of the ace of spades? A. Yes—I bought the paper myself at Somerset House—I think I bought about eight ton of paper—it was advertised as waste paper—I should think the ream of aces of spades would weight fifteen or sixteen lbs—there was newspapers, and waste paper of different descriptions in the eight ton—I cannot tell whether there was any name on the aces of spades—they were sold to a great many parties—I think one Elliot bought 4 cwt. of the paper in September, and he had them.

Alfred Knight, a stationer, if Basing-lane; and Thomas Wilson, a stationer, of Cheapside, gave the prisoner a good character.

GUILTY . Aged 37.— Transported for Life.

But that appears not quite to have been the final word… In , a plaintive cry appears in TO DO though I see no reference to it in the police report in the ?? edition of the ???, which I assume is the report referred to?

Please correct an error, March 1836

https://www.britishnewspaperarchive.co.uk/viewer/bl/0001427/18360329/029/0003 Morning Advertiser - Tuesday 29 March 1836

To the Editor of the Morning Advertiser. Sir,— I most earnestly entreat you to correct an error that whs made the police report some weeks back in the case of Mr. Henry Wheeler. It stated that dye or was found on his premises. I beg most solemnly to declare that he never was in possession of any such thing, and that the aces of spades found his house, were left by an individual of the name of ______. With respect to a press being taken, I beg to state it was a pasting-press, for which a licence of 4l. a year waa paid. Sir, I am ready to prove the above upon oath, therefore I trust, for the sake of an unhappy and persecuted family, you will insert this. I am, Sir, your obedient servant, MARY WHEELER. Witness, Henry Wheeler, Jun. No. 122, St. John-street, West Smithfield.

Wheeler’s wife also made a formal petition to the Home Office regarding her husband’s conviction and managed to secure a pardon in 1840.

https://discovery.nationalarchives.gov.uk/details/r/C14222948 HO 17/18/26

Description: Prisoner name(s): Henry Wheeler.

Prisoner age: 37.

Prisoner occupation: Card manufacturer.

Court and date of trial: Old Bailey January Sessions 1836.

Crime: Having in his possession impressions of a forged die (the ace of spades) (38) with intent to defraud the Revenue.

Initial sentence: Transportation for life.

Gaoler’s report: Character not known.

Annotated (Outcome): Nil; free pardon 27 August 1840.

Petitioner(s): Petition by prisoner undersigned by four people; Alfred Knight and Thomas Wilson (paper suppliers to prisoner).

Three petitions from Mary Wheeler (prisoner’s wife) one of which is undersigned by 24 people including 12 members of the jury.

Last petition is addressed to Commissioner of Stamps and Taxes; Henry Wheeler Junior (prisoner’s son) undersigned by 3 people.

Grounds for clemency (Petition Details): Wife and three children left without support; when received impressions did not check if were forgeries; impressions were wrapped in paper when given to prisoner by Lomas and not opened until seized by police; prisoner had no time to call witnesses at trial; his solicitor did not follow up all the evidence on prisoner’s behalf; so ill and deaf with a cold at trial he could not speak in his defence; delivered stamps belonged to someone else; his suppliers normally only supplied him with paper for address books; previous honest and industrious character; sentence too harsh; packs of cards found on premises were intended to be sold as waste cards; no strong evidence was evading stamp duty; trial judge held out hope of mitigation of sentence.

Other papers: Report from Commissioner of Stamps and Taxes recommending a remission of sentence.

Covering letter from Treasury Chambers.

Additional Information: Prisoner in New South Wales.